I
don’t really like writing about motherhood. It’s
been a soul-nourishing and (I think) mostly successful role in my life. After more than ten years, I’ve gained
insightful perspectives on raising children.
I also follow social policy debates concerning the intersection of
feminism, family life, motherhood, and/or work.
I follow them closely, and read a lot.
I have stuff to say.
The
reason I don’t like writing about motherhood is precisely that it’s deeply
important to so many people. For a wide
variety of good reasons, both personal and political, almost everyone has an
emotional stake in the topic. Strong and
visceral disagreements lurk at the core of many issues, and many of those
issues – like maternal instinct, nature versus nature, sexual parity – will
quite literally never be solved. Sometimes
I feel like, if I have to read one more argument between a primary caregiver (i.e.
stay at home mom) and a woman who works full-time outside of the home, my head
will explode, all over my office. And
that would be really bad. Because I’m
100% sure that my husband doesn’t even know the name, let alone the phone
number, of our cleaning company.
Generally
speaking, I’m not a woman who shies away from conflict, or controversy. Just ask the people who hate me. I’ve written on this blog about feminism and school
reform and therapy and sustainability.
Some of these posts (especially the feminism one) drew the attention of
several male internet trolls, who subsequently used my comments section to
equate feminism with a female supremacy movement. Well.
It’s not. But I will admit that
dumb shit like that often makes me wonder why all women don’t just abandon
conventional mixed-sex society and join a global version of the Combahee River
Collective. The best answer, I suspect, is that we’d miss gay men.
I
do like to joke about controversial issues, though, and satirize sensitive
political topics. (As – for the record,
internet trolls – I just did in the preceding paragraph. No. We aren’t all about to run away and form a
black feminist/gay male commune, or enslave you as dishwashers, or disembowel
you while you are drifting off into your manly Asperger alone-time at the
breakfast table. So, no need to leave a comment. Thanks.)
So
what is my problem, then? Why don’t I
write more hilarious missives about motherhood?
The answer is that some things I read about the subject leave me feeling
so humorless and annoyed that I can’t conjure up anything funny to say, that I would actually want to read. It becomes so personal for me that my heart
clenches, my brain freezes, and I get defensive. Like a liberal defending teachers
unions. A conservative defending
guns. Or a weird internet man reading a nothing
little post about feminism. I hate
feeling like that. I am 82% certain that
the best way to avoid any illness – from breast cancer and heart disease, to
varicose veins and goiter – is to take everything
with a grain of salt, and a dose of good humor. (Also, I spent my twenties crying, while
getting a PhD, and I’m sorta tapped out.)
Then I read this piece, which my friend Barbara
posted on her Facebook page with the comment:
REAL GUY. NOT SATIRE.
REAL GUY. NOT SATIRE.
[Go
ahead, take a minute. It’s a short
essay, with a simpleminded point.] Or, allow
me to summarize the essay for you, in case you start reading it and it burns
your eyes: My work made me take paternity leave. But moms always do more parenting. So I had nothing to do, and I was bored, and I
became an alcoholic. Then I went back to
work.
Now,
I am 54% sure that the best way to counter this buffoonery is with SATIRE. But here I am, in one of those rare moments,
when I am actually so pissed off, I am going to write a serious post about it. So thanks, William Giraldi. Now I’m going to get goiter. Whatever that is.
There
are people who find this kind of straightforward man-talk refreshing. And I get that. Essays should make you think. Some fact nuggets also undergird his
argument. Men, for example, don’t have functional
milk-boobs. Also, it’s more dangerous to
sink into an Mansperger trance when
you’re in charge of your own offspring on a street corner, because they don’t
know usually know their own address until they’re 7. And mothers may have stronger maternal
instincts. That instinct doesn’t make
caring for an infant easier for
them, but it may (and I said may, don’t freak out) make them just enough
attached to the infant, that they are more physically driven to keep it alive.
Well,
I didn’t find it refreshing. Or as I like a good essay to be:
enlightening. It actually wasn’t Giraldi’s insensitive and
narcissistic description of himself as being “bushwhacked by [his] surfeit of
free time” that nauseated me. That
didn’t bother me, because frankly, I don’t even understand it. FREE TIME?
I mean, there are plenty of things to do, other than strapping on
breasts, when you have a new baby. FREE
TIME? Clean the dishes. Go to the grocery store. Make mom a sandwich. Do the laundry. Do it over again because now there is more
poop on it. Buy your wife a DVD of Sex
in the City, so she has something to watch on TV when she’s sleepy and needs
female company. Jerk off once a day,
so she doesn’t have that to worry about later too. Or go
out and spend three hours picking out the absolute nicest bottle of Prosecco
you can find, and enjoy it with her at night.
You might even get lucky if her lady bits are healed.
No,
that wasn’t even the LEAST ENLIGHTENING part.
It’s the stuff about the drinking
that torpedoed my sense of humor, and reduced me to someone who needs to be
serious on the internet.
On
his paternity leave, Giraldi said, he was reduced to “medieval hangovers that
vanquished entire days. Sleep
interrupted by migraines and dehydration that felt downright malarial. Iffy decisions involving the diaperless
infant on an antique couch.” Iffy
decisions? Interrupted sleep? Dude. Let
me tell you about feeling medieval. And listen up good. Because if your wife hasn’t left you by now
and joined the Combahees, you might
still have the capacity to learn something in your wasteland of a shrunken cerebral
cortex.
For
years now, I’ve been wanting to write about a phenomenon I call: MOMAHOLICS. It’s a mostly non-descriptive word that I use
to describe that thing that so many new mothers do, mostly in the evenings. Which is, drink a little too much. Almost every mother I know – and not just
white, middle-class, stay-at-home moms – will at least recognize this issue, if
not in themselves, then in a friend.
When
you have little kids– as soul enriching as that is -- you can feel so drained,
and so exhausted, and so deprived of personal fulfillment in so many of your
familiar and traditional ways, that you come to look forward to a drink,
hopefully at the end of the day, with a passion that you may never have
had. In my head (and my experience) I
used to think about that coveted wine bottle sitting on the counter as the modern
incarnation of the “mother’s little helper.”
In most ways, I thought, it’s not as secretive or dangerous as the
1950’s valium epidemic, because more women now have more opportunities to
choose a different lifestyle, outside of the home.
But
in other ways, it’s actually worse.
Because so many women now make the choice to raise their kids all day
long -- or make the choice to try and balance their work and home lives – that they
feel it is mostly their fault if their
life isn’t totally balanced. Taking
valium because your husband came home late from work, and demanded a hot meal
seems easy to justify. That life sounds
sucky and annoying. But drinking an
entire bottle of wine by yourself every night -- because you need a release
from a choice that you’ve made, and can’t stop feeling guilty and worried about
-- is a bit more complicated.
I’m
not here to call anyone an alcoholic.
Not even myself, actually. And I
drink a lot. Based on my knowledge of
alcoholism, the actual disease is not just about quantity or doing it for the wrong
reasons. Even Giraldi drank entire
cases of Heineken over his “paternity leave,” and let’s start putting that in
quotation marks, but stopped again when he was back at work. The real alcoholic problem comes when the
alcohol is ALL you look forward to anymore.
The kids bring me down, the
liquor lifts me up. That kind of thing.
I’ve
never felt – and I’ve never, to my knowledge, had a mom or dad friend who felt – like that. Having said that, I did develop a rather
desperate taste for my nightly glass or two (or three) of wine when my kids
were especially little. And it wasn’t
until years later -- when I could direct their daily activities from a more or
less seated position -- that this sense of desperation about having JUST ONE THING only for myself at
night, that was not a responsibility or a chore or a weight on my shoulders, really
faded. Sometimes, I do worry that some
moms --or primary caregiver dads -- may not recognize these feelings, and will
fall down a slippery slope.
Did
Mr. Bored Dad’s essay bother me extra, because I’m aware of the alcoholism in
my own family line? I’m sure it
did. I admit it. Also, I wholeheartedly take responsibility
for any subjectivity affecting my reaction. So subjective essay meets subjective essay
once again. But I couldn’t help thinking
how in this day and age, this kind of unenlightened crap doesn’t deserve to be
published. Who does it enlighten? Where is the self-awareness? ALL
that Giraldi’s faux-paternity-induced alcoholism exemplifies is the sexist and
self-involved nature of his own subjectivity.
YOU
DRANK TOO MUCH ON PATERNITY LEAVE BECAUSE YOU WERE BORED? ! BORED?
Did you once think about how bored your wife might have been, staying
sober, while playing Elmo songs? Did you
think to offer her a beer, and take the baby for a walk? And what about those days when you aren’t
just bored, but also EXHAUSTED?
Reality
Check: I once had to call my husband at work, and beg him to come home early, which
was REALLY hard if not impossible for him in that job, because I threw my back
out due to weak stomach muscles, and I was lying on the floor in utter agony,
trying unsuccessfully to comfort my infant, with nobody there to help. I cooked and pureed vegetables every day, and
portioned them into ice cube containers, so my toddlers would always have
healthy food, even when I couldn’t make it to the grocery store. My older daughter had a diarrhea explosion all
over me in Central Park one day that was so severe, I had to borrow an extra
shirt of a guy in my playgroup just to get her home.
BORDEM
MADE YOU DRINK? CRYING MADE ME DRINK. Literally. I cried from exhaustion more times than I can
remember, and only the glass of wine at night, by myself in the kitchen, made
me feel better. Those were some of the
easy days. I once had to fight off the
instinct to shake my baby, because nobody was there, and I was so tired, and I
wanted her to sleep so badly, and she wouldn’t.
Thank God my mom intervened
with a bottle, and let me sleep one night.
My husband couldn’t get up at night in my place. He
didn’t have paternity leave.
I
have still never forgiven myself for almost shaking my baby, yet this guy has
forgiven himself for drinking his paternity leave away? Look, I haven’t completely lost my sense of
humor. I also get how having a slight
drinking problem because you are so intent on succeeding at motherhood that you
are stressed out might be a problem of privilege. It might even be a problem that feminism
helped to create. And, there might be mothers,
single and/or economically underprivileged ones, who don’t have the "luxury" to
drink too much, without terrible consequences.
But given the LIKELY universality of this issue, and the certain universality of how hard parenting is, my
personal reaction to someone who drinks too much because they’re bored on paternity leave is that you are
a one-man slap in the face to every parent, mom or dad, who struggles every day to find
fulfillment in the very difficult job of parenting.
Maybe instead of writing a puerile essay, he should have figured out how to work harder.
19 comments:
Oh, yes. Yes, yes, yes, yes. Also, the slippery slope thing worries me, too. For myself. Still.
Yes. Thanks for your comment, Elana.
Yes, the outrage is that someone published that article. If you are going to be an idiot and get drunk for an entire paternity leave and then write about it, at least THINK a little harder first. About why you were an idiot. That might be slightly more interesting. His essay is about as useful to society as those beer commercials that excuse men from having to engage in moral, thoughtful, or unselfish behavior.
Yes, he lost me at his equation of raising kids with men being laid off or retiring, but then he does go on to fully admit that his wife was caring for their child while he was using. The title should read "What I did when I was paid to not watch my kid"
Right. If it were titled differently or included some self criticism. Nothing. None of us are perfect. Betters of us admit it and try to improve.
Whoa - this really hit home. I spent a large portion of the evenings in my second kid's first year at least partially drunk. I also lived in a neighborhood where all of us privileged and educated mommies were meeting every morning to drink coffee (with rumchata) and commiserate about the miserable, boring, tedious, emotionally exhausting lives we were leading. By choice. We should be so lucky. Slippery slope - yes. Maybe. I also have alcoholism in my family AND am a typical, Puritanical American, so drinking of any sort worries me and makes me nervous, even though I do it with regularity. Momaholics are pretty much the norm in my world. But his essay offends me as well, perhaps because mostly I am unable to say all of this out loud to society at large and laugh about it?! Mom guilt at work. Again.
So much mom guilt. We should all try to reframe it as what it is: struggles with a hard job.
I think looking at why men think they don't have a role in the infanthood of children is more accurate. I refer to a man luke this as "jealous." Why? Because he's not the cener of wife's world. The tit sucker has been replaced. Sadly, i do know about the alcoholic checked out dad. ...these men have failed as
Adults and, i do believe, failed as partners, friends, husbands, lovers and sons. Women are taking on role of father AND mother because men are losing their role...or choosing not to step up and parent. Or is it that they are so selfish that they can't believe they were replaced by an infant?
Moms have a difficult time.....dads who drink to check out are stuck in adolescence.
I wish so much that men would talk more about THAT. jealousy. Adjustment. Their role. We could all talk about that. Instead a missed opportunity. Right?
Some men aren't equipped to talk: emotionally,; physically; logically. ...
They are trained to believe the woman raises kids....men do the career.... not in all cases..bur some men just aren't ready to be #2 or 3 or 4 on the list..
this is where their mothers' and fathers' failed..
Maybe it's my particular group of male friends, but not one of them (or me) has expressed any feelings of jealousy over the birth of their first child. Adjustment over accommodating a squalling infant in their previously quiet lives, yes, but that's not unique to either gender. All of them acknowledged the difficulties and the stress but we all have only felt joy over having children. Your comments (I signed up...) feel a little too general to be accurate.
There are poor parents of both genders. Playing Devil's advocate for a moment, perhaps the author's wife was one of those mothers who refuses to let her husband participate because he's "not doing it right", whether it's putting on diapers, giving the kid a bath, or holding them in the "right" position. Finding that he wasn't wanted, he chose to drink instead. He wouldn't be the first Dad indirectly barred from participation via condemnation of his "incompetence". Not an excuse, because he should have engaged regardless, but if true, more understandable than being completely disinterested as his article suggests.
Good points paul. I know so many great dads. So if I sounded too generalizing, it was not intentional. I just think fathers have to write about their struggles too, self consciously.
My biggest criticism with this guy's essay is that it is pointless and boring. What's the main idea of it anyway? Maybe BU has other reasons to fire him besides his fraudulent paternity leave. He is not even a mediocre writer. Lame guy, lame essay!
Yeah. Maybe should be ignored.
Erin, I totally agree, more male voices would be a good thing. Or perhaps more generally, the voices of working parents with a stay-at-home spouse. One of my best male friends is a SAHD in Manhattan. He has the many of the same complaints about his wife and his experience that my wife has about me and her experience as a SAHM. It's quite enlightening to hear his comments and realize that much of the conflict over parenting duties has little to do with gender but rather the different priorities of partners occupying different roles in a relationship: the breadwinner vs. the caregiver.
Much of the conflict in my own marriage over roles & responsibilities was over who had more free time and who did more work overall, with each of us under-appreciating what the other one was contributing. We both sucked at negotiating this, thankfully the issue has become moot now that our kids are generally old enough to manage themselves. But there is probably still lingering resentment on both sides.
Holy. He is insufferable. But, the slope is indeed slippery, whether working or staying home. In all seriousness, meet me for a drink sometime, Erin?
Sharp, EEC, as she was at Stanford
philippe.buc@univie.ac.at
Philippe! I just noticed this comment. I will write you.
Just received a check for $500.
Sometimes people don't believe me when I tell them about how much money you can make by taking paid surveys at home...
So I took a video of myself getting paid over $500 for doing paid surveys to set the record straight once and for all.
Post a Comment